Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2448/2025 of BILAL AHMAD KABOO Vs THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED AND ORS. on 3 November 2025
No.30 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(8008/2025) In WP(C) 2448/2025 Bilal Ahmad Kaboo …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Syed Faisal Qadri, Sr. AAG with Mr. Sikander Hayat Khan, Advocate Vs. The J&K Bank Limited and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Serial No.30
SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CM(8008/2025)
In WP(C) 2448/2025
Bilal Ahmad Kaboo
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. Syed Faisal Qadri, Sr. AAG with
Mr. Sikander Hayat Khan, Advocate
Vs.
The J&K Bank Limited and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.12.2025
1. Caveat stands discharged.
2. This is an application by the applicant Bilal Ahmad Kaboo seeking clarification/rectification of the clerical error that has crept in the order dated 3rd November, 2025.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant that the matter was taken up for consideration on 3rd November, 2025 on which date the applicant was permitted to withdraw the writ petition. It is submitted that in the order which was passed on 3rd November, 2025, the date of the order is erroneously reflected as 15th October, 2025 due to typographical mistake. MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 03.12.25
4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record, it is seen that the case was listed on 17th October, 2025, on which date interim directions were passed and the matter was fixed for consideration on 3rd November, 2025. The matter was thus taken up for consideration on 3rd November, 2025, on which date on the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the petition was dismissed as not pressed. We also find that though the case was dismissed as not pressed on 3rd November, 2025 but inadvertently and due to typographical mistake the date of order was mentioned as 15th October, 2025. The mistake pointed out by the applicant is, therefore, inadvertent and clerical in nature and deserves to be corrected.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the date of the order as appended with this application as Annexure-I, which is indicated as “15th October, 2025”, shall be read as “3rd November, 2025”. This order shall be placed by the Registry with the concerned file and shall be read as a modification of the order erroneously recorded as having been passed on 15th October, 2025.
6. CM disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 03.12.2025 <Mir Arif= MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 03.12.25