Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2658/2025 of M/S MUDISHAH CO BUBERNAGH KUPWARA TH.PROPRIETOR Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS on 29 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.42 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2658/2025 CM(7031/2025) M/S Mudishah Co Bubernagh Kupwara Th. Proprietor …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms

Serial No.42

SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

WP(C) 2658/2025

CM(7031/2025)

M/S Mudishah Co Bubernagh Kupwara

Th. Proprietor

…Petitioner(s)

Through:

Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate

Vs.

Union Territory of J&K and Ors.

...Respondent(s)

Through:

Ms Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

29.10.2025

1. Pursuant to the show cause notice issued by the STO, Circle, Kupwara, Kashmir on 10th December, 2024, and having received no reply thereto from the petitioner, the STO concerned vide order dated 20th December, 2024, directed cancellation of registration of the petitioner under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

2. Aggrieved by the cancellation of his registration, the petitioner filed an appeal under Section 107(1) of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, before the Appellate Authority, State Taxes Appeals-2, Kashmir. The appeal came to be dismissed by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 31st July, 2025, on the ground that the same was barred by limitation. This is how the petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking, inter alia, a direction to the respondents to restore his registration cancelled in terms of order dated 20th December, 2024.

3. Similar cases have come up for consideration before this Court, wherein, subject to the petitioners’ undertaking to deposit the tax and penalty along with interest in accordance with the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, directions have been issued to the Competent Authority to restore their registration. The aforesaid orders have been passed on the concession given by the respondents that they would restore the registration of the defaulting dealers provided they complied with law by submitting their returns and depositing the sales tax and other dues payable by them under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

4. Attention of this Court has been invited to an order dated 29th April, 2024 passed in WP(C) No. 873/2024 and order dated 1st April, 2024 passed in WP(C) No. 182/2024, wherein similar directions have been issued.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record and also in view of the fact that the case in hand is similar and identical to the aforementioned cases and, therefore, this petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the Competent Authority for registration of his GST number within a period of seven days from today. The competent Authority shall restore GST number of the petitioner immediately, subject to the completion of all requisite formalities. The petitioner shall file the returns and deposit the taxes and penalty along with interest within a period of seven days. In the event the needful is not done by the petitioner within the stipulated period, this order shall cease to be in operation.

6. Since this petition has been disposed of based on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, and also on the analogy of the cases earlier decided, this Court has not gone into the legal issued raised by the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.

7. Disposed of.

(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)

JUDGE

JUDGE

SRINAGAR: 29.10.2025 “Mir Arif”

(i) Whether the order is reportable? Yes/ No.

(ii) Whether the order is speaking? Yes/ No.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead