Jharkhand High Court

Cr.M.P./2408/2026 of RAJENDRA YADAV Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 9 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30342

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2408 of 2026 ------ Rajendra Yadav, Aged about 51 Years S/O Late Chetan Lal Yadav @ Chet Lal Mahto, R/O Vill- Alagdiha, P.O. Maskidih, P.S. Chalkusa, Dist.- Hazaribagh … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Prakash Mahato, S/o- Late

[2026:JHHC:30342]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr.M.P. No.2408 of 2026

------

Rajendra Yadav, Aged about 51 Years S/O Late Chetan Lal Yadav @ Chet Lal Mahto, R/O Vill- Alagdiha, P.O. Maskidih, P.S.

Chalkusa, Dist.- Hazaribagh

… Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Prakash Mahato, S/o- Late Chet Lal Mahato, R/o- Kustore No.- 4, Panitanki, P.O.- Kustore (Kusunda), P.S.- Kenduadih, District- Dhanbad

… Opposite Parties

------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

Page 1 of 3

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate

Ms. Arpita Sinha, Advocate For the State

: Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P. P.

------ Order No:-03 Dated:-09-10-2026

Heard the parties.

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 06.07.2026 passed by this Court.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 06.07.2026 passed by this Court to file a consolidated Cr.M.P. incorporating the amendments allowed by this Court. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence on the part of the advocate’s clerk, the said consolidated Cr.M.P. could not be filed within the stipulated time, which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 for non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 06.07.2026 passed by this Court. It is next submitted that non-compliance of the said peremptory order dated 06.07.2026 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 be restored to its original file.

Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection.

Page 2 of 3

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal.

Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2151 of 2023 before the concerned Bench after a week.

This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.10.2026-Animesh/

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead