Jharkhand High Court

Cr.M.P./1428/2026 of SURAJ TIWARI ALIAS SURAJ NATH TIWARI ALIAS SURAJ TIWARY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 9 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30344

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1428 of 2026 ------ Suraj Tiwari @ Suraj Nath Tiwari @ Suraj Tiwary aged 67 years, S/o Kailash Nath Tiwari; R/O South Jaipal Singh Stadium, Kutchery Road, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali & District- Ranchi … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of

[2026:JHHC:30344]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr.M.P. No.1428 of 2026

------

Suraj Tiwari @ Suraj Nath Tiwari @ Suraj Tiwary aged 67 years, S/o Kailash Nath Tiwari; R/O South Jaipal Singh Stadium, Kutchery Road, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali & District- Ranchi

… Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Ravi Prakash Prasad S/o Deonandan Prasad; Bank Officer Sai Baba Apartment, Flat No.B-1/5, P.O.- Chirachas, P.S- Chirachas, Dist- Bokaro. At present Elahabad Bank (Branch Manager), G.E.L. Church Branch, Ranchi, P.O.- Church Road, P.S.- Lower Bazar, Dist.- Ranchi

… Opposite Parties

------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Page 1 of 3

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishi Pallava, Advocate For the State

: Ms. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P. P.

------ Order No:-05 Dated:-09-10-2026

Heard the parties.

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for modification of the order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioner files three copies of the revalidated demand drafts. Let the same be kept in the record.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that vide order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022, the petitioner was given the privileges of anticipatory bail and directed to surrender before the court below within four months upon his undertaking to deposit a demand draft of Rs.28,00,000/- drawn in favour of Indian Bank, G.E.L. Church Branch, Ranchi. It is next submitted that due to paucity of money, the petitioner could not prepare the said demand draft within the stipulated time, hence, he could not surrender within the stipulated time. It is next submitted that in the meantime the petitioner has arranged the money and prepared the said demand draft and the copy of the same has been annexed with the brief. It is next submitted that now the petitioner is ready and willing to surrender before the learned court below and unless four weeks’ extension is granted to him, he will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the time period for the petitioner to surrender before the court below in terms of the order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022 be extended by four weeks from the date of this order.

Page 2 of 3

Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the prayer for extension of time for the petitioner to surrender in the court below in terms of the order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022 is allowed. Accordingly, the order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022 is modified by directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks from the date of this order in terms of the order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022.

The order dated 05.09.2023 passed in A.B.A. No.5797 of 2022 is modified to the aforesaid extent only.

This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.10.2026-Animesh/

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead