B.A./9388/2026 of KUNDAN KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 87 of 2026 for the offence registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of BNS and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D), 84(C) of IT Act, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IIcum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime cases, Deoghar.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted. One Mobile and One SIM Card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, which are standing in the name of other person. One victim has been identified, who is alleged to have been defrauded to the extent of Rs. 2400/-. The learned counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the alleged defrauded amount in cash without prejudice to his stand in the trial.

3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that he could not obtain the criminal antecedent report of the petitioner. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned

counsel for the petitioner, which is based on record and the case-diary received in connected case, are not in dispute.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime cases, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 87 of 2026, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) The petitioner shall deposit Rs. 2400/- in cash before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial.

(ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(iii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(v) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

5. The learned court shall call for the criminal antecedent report of the petitioner from the State and if any criminal antecedent is found, the petitioner shall not be enlarged on bail.

6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

Dated: 08.10.2026

Uploaded On: 08.10.2026

Mukul/-