Jharkhand High Court

B.A./9412/2026 of PARU ANSARI ALIAS PADHU ANSARI ALIAS MD HUSSAIN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30171

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9412 of 2026 ------ Paru Ansari @ Padhu Ansari @ Md Hussain Ansari, aged about 41 years, son of Israyel Ansari @ Ismail Ansari, Resident of Pakuria, P.O. & P.S.-Pakuria, District-Pakur, Jharkhand (816117). .... .... ….

( 2026:JHHC:30171 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No.9412 of 2026

------ Paru Ansari @ Padhu Ansari @ Md Hussain Ansari, aged about 41 years, son of Israyel Ansari @ Ismail Ansari, Resident of Pakuria, P.O. & P.S.-Pakuria, District-Pakur, Jharkhand (816117).

.... .... …. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

.... .... .... Opposite Party

------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Page 1 of 2

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P

------

Order No.02 Dated- 08-10-2026

Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pakuria P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(ii)(b) & 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in the sale of Ganja and 2 kg of Ganja and 70 pieces of Smoking Pipes were recovered from the petitioner which comes under intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.08.2026 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, N.D.P.S., Pakur in connection with Pakuria P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/10/2026 Abhiraj/

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead