Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8500/2026 of SUMAN KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8500 of 2026 Suman Kumar Das, aged about 23 years, son of Arjun Das, resident of Village - Nawapatro, P.O. & P.S.- Madhupur, District - Deoghar. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:30096
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8500 of 2026
Suman Kumar Das, aged about 23 years, son of Arjun Das, resident of Village - Nawapatro, P.O. & P.S.- Madhupur, District - Deoghar.
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP
---
05/08.10.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2026 in connection with Deoghar Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 85 of 2026, registered for offence punishable under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 & under sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of I.T. Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime Special Court at Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature bearing Sindagi P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025. However, he has submitted that the case of co-accused has been rejected with an observation that they may renew the prayer for bail after six months. He has referred to the order dated 09.09.2026 passed in case of the co-accused, namely Shekar Kumar Das in B.A. No. 7703 of 2026.
4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are numerous materials against the petitioner including the fact that certain amount arising out of cyber offence has also been credited in the bank account of the petitioner.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the materials collected during investigation as pointed out by the learned counsel for the state and that the petitioner also has
2026:JHHC:30096 2
criminal antecedent, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and hence, this bail application is rejected.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:08.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.10.2026