Jharkhand High Court

B.A./8799/2026 of NAKUL LOHRA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30128

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8799 of 2026 Nakul Lohra, Aged about 22 Years, S/O - Shankar Lohra Resident of Village- Khukhra P.O.- Bero, P.S-Bero District- Ranchi … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM:

2026:JHHC:30128

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 8799 of 2026

Nakul Lohra, Aged about 22 Years, S/O - Shankar Lohra Resident of Village- Khukhra P.O.- Bero, P.S-Bero District- Ranchi

…

…

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

…

… Opp. Party

---

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

---

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, Advocate

Mr. Bipin Bihari, Advocate

Ms. Shipra Sonam, Advocate

Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate

For the Opp. Party

: Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate

For the Informant

: Mr. Pandey A.N. Roy, Advocate

---

06/8th October 2026

Page 1 of 3

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Bero P.S. Case No. 117/2024 for the offence registered under Section 96 and 351(2) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate at Ranchi.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent and the charge- sheet has already been submitted. The statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS be perused, wherein she has stated that she is major and had married the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the informant, who happens to be father of the victim, has no objection, so far as the prayer for bail is concerned.

4. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that if the informant has no objection to the prayer for bail, he has nothing to say, but the petitioner will have to face the trial.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the informant of the case has no objection to the prayer for bail, the petitioner is directed to

2026:JHHC:30128

Page 2 of 3

be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty- Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Ranchi in connection with Bero P.S. Case No. 117/2024, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)

Dated: 08.10.2026

Uploaded On: 08.10.2026

Mukul/-

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead