Jharkhand High Court

B.A./9415/2026 of XXX Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30159

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9415 of 2026 With I.A. No. 12532 of 2026 XXXX … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh,

( 2026:JHHC:30159 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9415 of 2026 With I.A. No. 12532 of 2026

XXXX

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand …

… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Ms. Sweta Singh, APP

For the Informant : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate

Page 1 of 3

---

04/08.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Garhwa (M) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 64(2) (m), 351(2), 351(3), and 352 of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victim is major who is also the informant of the case and the petitioner is the brother-in-law of the sister of the victim. The learned counsel submits that charge sheet has not been submitted, but since the matter is within the family, there has been some settlement.

4. Learned counsel for the informant who also appears to be the victim of the case has submitted that he has no objection if the petitioner is enlarged on bail.

5. The learned counsel for the opposite-party state has submitted that if the informant has no objection, the state has nothing to say.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the informant who happens to the victim and is major and she has no objection to the prayer for bail of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa, in connection

( 2026:JHHC:30159 )

Page 2 of 3

2

with Garhwa (M) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, on the following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

7. Pending I.A. No. 12532 of 2026 stands disposed of.

8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.

9. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 08.10.2026 Uploaded on 09.10.2026 Binit/

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead