Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9422/2026 of RAJU KUMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 8 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9422 of 2026 ------ Raju Kumar Singh, aged about 28 years, Son of Karelal Singh, Resident of Tila Tand (Danre More), P.O.-Poraiyahat, Police Station- Poraiyahat, District-Godda, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30177 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9422 of 2026
------ Raju Kumar Singh, aged about 28 years, Son of Karelal Singh, Resident of Tila Tand (Danre More), P.O.-Poraiyahat, Police Station- Poraiyahat, District-Godda, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 08-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.25 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons being the brother-in-law (saala) of the deceased namely Abhishek Kumar Singh, has committed his murder. It is submitted that though the source of knowledge of death of the deceased to the informant is the statement of 04 years son of the deceased namely -Shivraj, but the police has not recorded the statement of Shivraj during the investigation of the case, but submitted charge-sheet. It is next submitted that the postmortem report goes to show that this is a case of suicide and the reason for commission of suicide by the deceased is because of the informant who is the father of the deceased was selling their ancestral land without the consent of the deceased. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.08.2026 in B.A. No.7545 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.03.2026 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection Poraiyahat P.S. Case No.25 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/10/2026 Abhiraj/