Jharkhand High Court

B.A./9280/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS RAJESH YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9280 of 2026 Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Yadav, aged about 25 years, son of Surya Narayan Yadav, Resident of village Sanwadiya Dumriya, P.O. & P.S. Mohanpur, District-Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

( 2026:JHHC:30071 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9280 of 2026

Rajesh Kumar Yadav @ Rajesh Yadav, aged about 25 years, son of Surya Narayan Yadav, Resident of village Sanwadiya Dumriya, P.O. & P.S. Mohanpur, District-Deoghar … … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand …

… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP

---

04/07.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Counter affidavit filed during the court proceeding is taken on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cyber-crime-special court, Deoghar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted. There is one crime link and one victim to the extent of Rs. 70,000/-. He has further submitted that one mobile and one SIM Card alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

5. The petitioner had one case of similar nature, but he has been acquitted by the learned court.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail, however the aforesaid submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.

7. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is ready to deposit the alleged amount in cash without prejudice to his case.

8. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner

( 2026:JHHC:30071 )

2

above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-cyber-crime-special court, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2026, on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 70,000/-(Rs. Seventy thousand) as cash security before the learned court without prejudice to his rights.

(ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(iii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.

9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail.

10. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.10.2026 Uploaded on 09.10.2026 Binit/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead