Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8341/2026 of SURESH YADAV Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8341 of 2026 Suresh Yadav aged about 55 years, son of Huro Yadav, resident of H.E. School Road, Visti Para, Near Shitala Mandir, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30108 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8341 of 2026
Suresh Yadav aged about 55 years, son of Huro Yadav, resident of H.E. School Road, Visti Para, Near Shitala Mandir, P.O. and P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…
… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, APP
: Mr. Aditya Kumar Jha, Advocate
---
05/07.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with G.R. No. 2163 of 2026, arising out of Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 0050 of 2026 for the offences registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 117(2), 74, 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhanbad.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner in in custody since 23.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has already been submitted. The learned counsel submits that the specific allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had assaulted the mother of the victim by lathi. He further submits that mother of the victim has not suffered any injury as per injury report. So far as the other co-accused are concerned, there are allegations against them.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State and the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and have submitted that the petitioner along with others have committed the alleged offence and therefore the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting the mother of the victim by lathi who as per the injury report reveals that she did not suffer any injury; chargesheet having already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner
( 2026:JHHC:30108 ) 2
above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhanbad, in connection with G.R. No. 2163 of 2026, arising out of Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 0050 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.10.2026 Uploaded on 09.10.2026 Binit/