Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9409/2026 of VIKAS KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9409 of 2026 ------ Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar, aged about 29 years, Son of Nagina Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Sav kala, Aamas Sav Kala, Near Malwarwadih, Barki Sawo, P.O. Sav Kala, P.S.- Aamas, District- Gaya (Bihar). .... .... …. Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:30027] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9409 of 2026
------ Vikas Kumar @ Vikash Kumar, aged about 29 years, Son of Nagina Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Sav kala, Aamas Sav Kala, Near Malwarwadih, Barki Sawo, P.O. Sav Kala, P.S.- Aamas, District- Gaya (Bihar). .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 99 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 111, 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3), 318(4), 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an organized gang of criminals which was involved in theft of motorcycle and selling the same. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that at present there is no pending cases against the petitioner; as the case in which the petitioner was involved, ended up in acquittal. It is also submitted that no incriminating material has been recovered from the petitioner. It is then submitted that though charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, but none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.06.2026 as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-XVI at Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 99 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.10.2026 Amar/