Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8517/2026 of SAMID ANSARI Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8517 of 2026 Samid Ansari, Aged about 31 years, Son of Mustakim Ansari, Resident of Village Panchrukhi, P.O Karanjo & P.S.- Margomunda, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:30049
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8517 of 2026
Samid Ansari, Aged about 31 years, Son of Mustakim Ansari, Resident of Village Panchrukhi, P.O Karanjo & P.S.- Margomunda, District- Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
---
06/07.10.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) & 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66 (B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge - II – cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one mobile and one SIM are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and no victim has been identified. He also submits that no crime link has been found. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 and charge sheet has already been submitted.
4. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the SIM is standing in the name of another person to which the petitioner has no explanation. So far as other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are concerned, the same are not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and
2026:JHHC:30049 2
considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge - II – cum- Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.10.2026