Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8613/2026 of NILESH KUMAR DAS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8613 of 2026 Nilesh Kumar Das, aged about 23 years, S/o-Bhopal Mahra, R/o Village-Bardahi, P.O.+P.S.-Pathardda O.P. (Sarath), District-Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30081 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8613 of 2026
Nilesh Kumar Das, aged about 23 years, S/o-Bhopal Mahra, R/o Village-Bardahi, P.O.+P.S.-Pathardda O.P. (Sarath), District-Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.
---
05/07.10.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2026 in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, registered under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5), 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66B, 66C, 66D and 84C of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. No victim has been identified, and no crime link has been found. It is alleged that three mobile phones and two SIM cards have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he submits that the SIM cards are in the name of the petitioner or his friends.
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber ( 2026:JHHC:30081 )
2
Crime, Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: