B.A./9278/2026 of SIRAJUDDIN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

( 2026:JHHC:30073 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 9278 of 2026

Sirajuddin Ansari, aged about 20 years, Son of Usman Ansari, Resident of Village Anjana, P.O. & P.S.-Palajori, District-Deoghar

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Ms. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.

---

03/07.10.2026

Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, registered under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2), 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information and Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber-Crime-Special Court, Deoghar.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2026 having no criminal antecedent. The charge-sheet has already been submitted. Two mobiles and three SIM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Some of them are in his name and some are in the name of other persons.

4. During investigation, one crime link has been identified and one victim has been identified to the extent of Rs.3,112/-.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to deposit the aforesaid amount without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.

( 2026:JHHC:30073 )

2

7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cyber- Crime-Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 89 of 2026, on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall deposit Rs. 3,112/- in cash before the learned court, which is the alleged defrauded amount linked with the identified victim. The deposit will be without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner in the trial.

(ii) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.

(iii) The other bailor should be his close relative.

(iv) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.

(v) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.

(vi) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.

8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.

9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Nandini Date of Uploading: