Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9401/2026 of ABDUL ROFF ALIAS ABDUL RAUF Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9401 of 2026 ------ Abdul Roff @ Abdur Rauf about 33 years, S/o Kalimuddin Shekh R/o Vill- Chandpur P.O.- Chandpur, P.S. Samsherganj, Dist- Murshidabad, (West Bengal). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:30025] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9401 of 2026
------ Abdul Roff @ Abdur Rauf about 33 years, S/o Kalimuddin Shekh R/o Vill- Chandpur P.O.- Chandpur, P.S. Samsherganj, Dist- Murshidabad, (West Bengal). .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Md. Yasir Arafat, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 104 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(a), 22(a) of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in selling of brown sugar which is also known as ‘Heroin’ and 30.34 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the co-accused person Sattar Sheikh who disclosed that the same has been sold by the petitioner to him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.08.2026 as mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Pakur in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 104 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.10.2026 Amar/