Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9367/2026 of SACHIN SAHU Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9367 of 2026 ------ Sachin Sahu, aged about 31 years, Son of Marwari Sahu, Resident of Village : Silafari, Post Office : Khora, Police Station – Gumla, District : Gumla, State : Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29993] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9367 of 2026
------ Sachin Sahu, aged about 31 years, Son of Marwari Sahu, Resident of Village : Silafari, Post Office : Khora, Police Station – Gumla, District : Gumla, State : Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 327 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(b), 22(b), 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and on being led to the recovery by the petitioner, 6 grams of brown sugar has been recovered from the house of the co-accused Etwa Oraon. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the seized brown sugar comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.08.2026 as mentioned in para-26 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 05.10.2026 passed in B.A. No.9260 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Gumla in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 327 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-07.10.2026 Saroj/