Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8983/2026 of MANISH KUMAR YADAV @ BATLA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8983 of 2026 ------ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Batla, aged about 19 years, Son of Satya Narayan Yadav, resident of Digwadih, Near J.N.M. School, P.O. & P.S.- Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:30033] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8983 of 2026
------ Manish Kumar Yadav @ Batla, aged about 19 years, Son of Satya Narayan Yadav, resident of Digwadih, Near J.N.M. School, P.O. & P.S.- Jorapokhar, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradyot Chatterjee, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-03 Dated:-07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 365 of 2025 arising out Tundi P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 3723 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted sub-station batteries and e-rikshaw (Toto) battery and a mobile phone from the Power Substation in Tundi, Dhanbad. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the First Information Report yet without putting him on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit dated 29.09.2026, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.03.2026 as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Jduge-XVI, Dhanbad in connection with S.T. Case No. 365 of 2025 arising out Tundi P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 3723 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.10.2026 Amar/