Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9407/2026 of MANOJ MUNDA Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9407 of 2026 ------ Manoj Munda aged about 25 years, S/o Guman Munda R/o Village- Kurkutta P.O.- Hakaduwa, P.S.- Maranghada, District- Khunti (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:30026] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9407 of 2026
------ Manoj Munda aged about 25 years, S/o Guman Munda R/o Village- Kurkutta P.O.- Hakaduwa, P.S.- Maranghada, District- Khunti (Jharkhand).
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Saiko P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(2), 318 (4), 338, 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 192 of Motor Vehicle Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in committing theft of motorcycle and was apprehended by police while riding the stolen motorcycle with fake number plate. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.08.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. Though charge-sheet has been submitted but none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khunti in connection with Saiko P.S. Case No. 13 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 07.10.2026 Amar/