Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9391/2026 of SHIVA GOUR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9391 of 2026 ------ Shiva Gour, aged about 30 years, son of Kinkar Gour, Resident of Shankosi Road No.5, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, District-East Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30016 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9391 of 2026
------ Shiva Gour, aged about 30 years, son of Kinkar Gour, Resident of Shankosi Road No.5, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.- Mango, District-East Singhbhum.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No. 134 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Section 25(1- B)(a), 26, 27 & 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons has committed murder of the nephew of the informant namely Devdas Gour. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Niraj Pradhan who is the brother of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the main allegation is against Devashish Pradhan @ Gour and Niraj Pradhan who killed the deceased over some dispute of Rs.1,500/- which the deceased took from the Devashish Pradhan @ Gour. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.06.2026 as mentioned in para-19 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JM-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No. 134 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/10/2026 Abhiraj/