Jharkhand High Court

WPC/364/2026 of RAHUL AZAD Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30139

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 364 of 2026 --------- Rahul Azad aged about 29 years S/o late Rajay Kumar, Village- Sukhbana, Ward No-10, Adarash Nagar, P.O.-Nawada, P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa, Jharkhand-822114 Garhwa Jharkhand. ......Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of

2026:JHHC:30139

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P. (S) No. 364 of 2026

---------

Rahul Azad aged about 29 years S/o late Rajay Kumar, Village- Sukhbana, Ward No-10, Adarash Nagar, P.O.-Nawada, P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa, Jharkhand-822114 Garhwa Jharkhand.

......Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. The Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa Ranchi 834004.

3. The District Superintendent of Education, Garhwa, Jharkhand (Purana Samharnalay Parisar, Bikash Bhawan-B., Pratham Talla), Collectorate Building, P.O. & P.S.-Garhwa 822114.

4. Robin Kumar aged about 21 years s/o Late Rajay Kumar

5. Ragini Kumari aged about 26 years d/o Late Rajay Kumar

6. Rohini Kumari aged about 24 years d/o Late Rajay Kumar Respondent no. 4-6 R/o Adarsh Nagar vill-Sukhbana, P.O. Nawada, P.S. Danda Garhwa, Jharkhand.

7. Renu Devi aged about 34 years, 2nd Wife of Late Rajay Kumar

8. Riya Kumari aged about 18 years, d/o Renu Devi

9. Ruchi Kumari aged about 16 years, d/o Renu Devi

10. Rupanjali Kumari aged about 7 years, d/o Renu Devi

11. Rajbir Kumar aged about 5 years, s/o Renu Devi Respondent no. 9 to 11 are minors and represented through their legal guardian mother Renu Devi W/o Late Rajay Kumar and Respondent no. 7 to 11 R/o vill- Meral (Madhuri Tola), P.O. & P.S. Meral Dist- Garhwa Jharkhand.

Page 1 of 2

.....Respondent(s)

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to G.P.-VI

--------- 03/Dated:-07.10.2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue this writ application and seeks permission to withdraw this case.

2. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A., if any, also stands closed.

(Deepak Roshan, J.) OCTOBER 7, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 09/10/2026

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead