Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8596/2026 of IRFAN ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8596 of 2026 Irfan Ansari, Aged about 29 years, Son of Md Barkat Ansari, Resident of Village Pandaniya, P.O & P.S.-Margomunda, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:30052
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8596 of 2026
Irfan Ansari, Aged about 29 years, Son of Md Barkat Ansari, Resident of Village Pandaniya, P.O & P.S.-Margomunda, District- Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P.
---
04/07.10.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2026 in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) & 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66 (B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge - II - cum Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that charge sheet has already been submitted. He submits that two mobile and two SIMs are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, but no crime link and no victim has been identified during investigation. He also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
4. Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the mobile and SIMs recovered from the possession of the petitioner are standing in the name of other persons to which the petitioner has no explanation. However, the other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and
2026:JHHC:30052
2
considering the fact that charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge - II - cum Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 80 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.10.2026