Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9389/2026 of SANAT TUDU Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9389 of 2026 ------ Sanat Tudu, aged about 23 years, son of Late Manju Tudu, Resident of Kantaltola (Katahaltola), Sarkanda, P.O. & P.S.-Ishipur Barahat, District-Bhagalpur, State-Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30014 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9389 of 2026
------ Sanat Tudu, aged about 23 years, son of Late Manju Tudu, Resident of Kantaltola (Katahaltola), Sarkanda, P.O. & P.S.-Ishipur Barahat, District-Bhagalpur, State-Bihar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Mirzachauki P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026 corresponding to G.R Case No.487 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of the husband of the informant namely Marang Tudu. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of his confessional statement. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-22 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.05.2026 as mentioned in para- 21 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Sahibganj in connection with Mirzachauki P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026 corresponding to G.R Case No.487 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/10/2026 Abhiraj/