Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8228/2026 of RAHUL RAWANI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8228 of 2026 Rahul Rawani, Aged about 26 years, Son of Pawan Rawani, Resident of Village Bhero, P.O & P.S.- Pathrol, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:30058
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8228 of 2026
Rahul Rawani, Aged about 26 years, Son of Pawan Rawani, Resident of Village Bhero, P.O & P.S.- Pathrol, District- Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP
---
04/07.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.71 of 2026, registered under Sections 319(2), 318 (4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2) of BNS Act 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of IT Act (Amendment Act), 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – Crime – Special Court, Deoghar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2026. Charge sheet has already been submitted. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is submitted that 1 mobile phone and 1 SIM card are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, but there is no crime link and no victim has been identified.
4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the SIM is standing in the name of someone else. However, the other submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be 2026:JHHC:30058
enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber – Crime – Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.71 of 2026, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026