Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8844/2026 of RAJAK ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8844 of 2026 ------ Rajak Ansari, aged about 27 years, son of Nur Mohamad Ansari, resident of vill-Dulori, P.O.-Chatro, P.S.-Bhelwaghati, District- Giridih, Jharkhand-815314. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:30021 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8844 of 2026
------ Rajak Ansari, aged about 27 years, son of Nur Mohamad Ansari, resident of vill-Dulori, P.O.-Chatro, P.S.-Bhelwaghati, District- Giridih, Jharkhand-815314.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. S. Hamidul Haqe, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated- 07-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.83 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 336(3), 338, 340(2), 318(4), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner accompanied by his father-in- law went to the office of Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara with a forged appointment letter issued in his favour as a Clerk in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-10 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the main culprit is Mumtaj Ansari and mother-in-law of the petitioner has filed Complaint Case No.1775 of 2026 against the said Mumtaj Ansari for having issued a forged appointment letter in favour of the petitioner; after cheating him of Rs.1,80,000/-. It is then submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.83 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/10/2026 Abhiraj/