Jharkhand High Court

Cont.(Cvl)/599/2026 of BHIRGU NATH RAM Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

2026:JHHC:30141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 599 of 2026 --------------- Bhirgu Nath Ram, aged about 65 years, S/o- Deo Prasad Ram, R/o- Village: Bazra, P.O- Hehal, P.S-Ranchi, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand; ........Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary,

2026:JHHC:30141

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cont. Case (Cvl.) No. 599 of 2026

---------------

Bhirgu Nath Ram, aged about 65 years, S/o- Deo Prasad Ram, R/o- Village: Bazra, P.O- Hehal, P.S-Ranchi, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand;

........Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhavan, P.O+P.S- Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand;

3. The Director, Primary Education, Department of School Education & of Literacy, Government Jharkhand, Project Bhavan, P.O+P.S- Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand;

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Simdega, PO+PS+DIST: Simdega, Jharkhand.

5. The District Superintendent of Education, Ranchi, PO+PS+DIST: Ranchi, Jharkhand.

6. The Accountant General of Jharkhand, P.O+P.S-Doranda, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand; ...... Opposite Parties

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate

Page 1 of 2

For the OP-State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III

Order No.04/Dated: 7th October, 2026

1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, has submitted that he does not want to press the present contempt petition as the decision in pursuant to the order passed by the learned writ Court, which is the subject matter of the present contempt case, has already been taken by the concerned opposite parties which is appended as Annexure-B to the show cause, which the petitioner intends to challenge by filing appropriate application before the appropriate Forum.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the concerned opposite parties has raised no objection to the said prayer.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is being closed and, as such, disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order 2026:JHHC:30141

2

as appended as Annexure-B to the show cause by filing appropriate application before the appropriate Forum.

4. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of.

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

Dated:07.10.2026 Sudhir

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead