Jharkhand High Court

B.A./9384/2026 of SAMRESH RAVIDAS @ MITHUN Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9384 of 2026 ------ Samresh Ravidas @ Mithun, aged about 34 years, son of Hari Podo Ravidas, resident of Kerwadungri, P.O. and P.S.-Sundernagar, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

( 2026:JHHC:30011 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No.9384 of 2026

------ Samresh Ravidas @ Mithun, aged about 34 years, son of Hari Podo Ravidas, resident of Kerwadungri, P.O. and P.S.-Sundernagar, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum.

.... .... …. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

.... .... .... Opposite Party

------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate

: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, Addl.P.P

------

Order No.02 Dated- 07-10-2026

Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26(1) & 35 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 03 live cartridges. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-12 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.06.2026 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Bagbera P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 07/10/2026 Abhiraj/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead