Jharkhand High Court

B.A./9369/2026 of JAYARAM BHARASAGAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9369 of 2026 ------ Jayaram Bharasagar, S/o – Anand Bharasagar, Age – 37 Years, R/o – Vill – Kamalpur, P.O. + P.S. – Biramaharajpur, Dist – Sonapur, Odisha .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

[2026:JHHC:29996] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No.9369 of 2026

------ Jayaram Bharasagar, S/o – Anand Bharasagar, Age – 37 Years, R/o – Vill – Kamalpur, P.O. + P.S. – Biramaharajpur, Dist – Sonapur, Odisha .... .... …. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

.... .... .... Opposite Party

------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner : Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate For the State

: Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P.

------ Order No:-02 Dated:-07-10-2026

Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025(N)(S) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) & 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the co-accused Bhupesh Kumar was apprehended by police while illegally carrying 6 Kg of Ganja for sale and he disclosed that the petitioner is the supplier of the said Ganja. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that no witness has been examined during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the seized Ganja comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 31.07.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.12.2025 passed in B.A. No.10817 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, N.D.P.S., Ranchi in connection with Rail (Ranchi) P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025(N)(S) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-07.10.2026 Saroj/

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead