Jharkhand High Court

WPC/3173/2015 of MD MOBASHSHARUL HOQUE AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS on 7 October 2026

2026:JHHC:29983

) W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015 ------ 1. Md. Mobashsharul Hoque, son of Abul Wahab, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj. 2. Md. Muslim son of Md. Wasif, resident of Naya Palas,

( 2026:JHHC:29983 )

W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015

------

1. Md. Mobashsharul Hoque, son of Abul Wahab, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.

2. Md. Muslim son of Md. Wasif, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.

3. Rina Khatoon, daughter of Late Shaukat Biswas, resident of village Harindanga Bazar, P.O., P.S. and District Pakur.

Page 1 of 3

…. Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi office at Gyandeep Campus, Bargawa, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi.

3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi office at Gyandeep Campus, Bargawa, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, P.O. Sahibganj, and P.S. Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj.

5. The District Education Officer, Controller of Examination, Sahibganj, P.O. Sahibganj, and P.S. Sahibganj (T), District Sahibganj.

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajmahal, P.O. and P.S. Rajmahal, District Sahibganj.

7. The Managing Committee, Madarasaziaululoom, Nayapalas Bona, represented through Secretary situated at Nayapalas Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S. Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.

Page 2 of 3

Respondent(s)

------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Advocate

For the State

: Ms. P. Priyamvada, AC to GP-V For the Resp. JAC : Ms. Reeshita Singh, Advocate

------

Order No.11/Dated: 07.10.2026

1. The order dated 08.01.2019 reads as under: - “Let this case go out of my list so as to be placed before an appropriate bench after obtaining permission from Hon’ble the Chief Justice.”

2. But the learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has no instruction to press the present writ petition. Consequently, he does not want to press the present writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the other sides have raised no objection.

4. In view of above submission, the order is being passed.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

6. Pending I. As, if any, stands disposed of.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 07.10.2026 Vedanti/Uploaded on 08.10.2026

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead