Jharkhand High Court
WPC/3173/2015 of MD MOBASHSHARUL HOQUE AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS on 7 October 2026
2026:JHHC:29983
) W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015 ------ 1. Md. Mobashsharul Hoque, son of Abul Wahab, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj. 2. Md. Muslim son of Md. Wasif, resident of Naya Palas,
( 2026:JHHC:29983 )
W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 3173 of 2015
------
1. Md. Mobashsharul Hoque, son of Abul Wahab, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.
2. Md. Muslim son of Md. Wasif, resident of Naya Palas, Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S.- Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.
3. Rina Khatoon, daughter of Late Shaukat Biswas, resident of village Harindanga Bazar, P.O., P.S. and District Pakur.
Page 1 of 3
…. Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Chairman, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi office at Gyandeep Campus, Bargawa, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi.
3. The Secretary, Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi office at Gyandeep Campus, Bargawa, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District Ranchi
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj, P.O. Sahibganj, and P.S. Sahibganj (T), District- Sahibganj.
5. The District Education Officer, Controller of Examination, Sahibganj, P.O. Sahibganj, and P.S. Sahibganj (T), District Sahibganj.
6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajmahal, P.O. and P.S. Rajmahal, District Sahibganj.
7. The Managing Committee, Madarasaziaululoom, Nayapalas Bona, represented through Secretary situated at Nayapalas Bona P.O. Shrikund, P.S. Kotalpokhar, District Sahibganj.
Page 2 of 3
Respondent(s)
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Sinha, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. P. Priyamvada, AC to GP-V For the Resp. JAC : Ms. Reeshita Singh, Advocate
------
Order No.11/Dated: 07.10.2026
1. The order dated 08.01.2019 reads as under: - “Let this case go out of my list so as to be placed before an appropriate bench after obtaining permission from Hon’ble the Chief Justice.”
2. But the learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has no instruction to press the present writ petition. Consequently, he does not want to press the present writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the other sides have raised no objection.
4. In view of above submission, the order is being passed.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
6. Pending I. As, if any, stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 07.10.2026 Vedanti/Uploaded on 08.10.2026
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…