B.A./8387/2026 of XXXXX Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

( 2026:JHHC:30109 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8387 of 2026

XXXX

… … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand …

… Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate

For the Opp. Party : Mr. Praful Jojo, APP

For the Informant : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate

(through V.C.)

---

04/07.10.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Satgawan P.S. Case No. 37 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 (corresponding Section 341, 323, 325, 307,379,504,34 of IPC) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Koderma.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There was dispute in connection with plastering of wall from both sides and it is alleged that the petitioner threw broken pieces of flower pots from the terrace upon the victim due to which the victim suffered grievous injury. The learned counsel has submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted on 07.09.2026.

4. Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there are two victims and one victim has suffered grievous injury on his head. Earlier also, the petitioner had attacked on the mother of the informant.

5. The learned counsel for the State has also opposed the prayer for bail.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the specific allegation made against the petitioner and grievous injury has been found on vital part of the body and the petitioner happens to be the immediate neighbour of the victims who

( 2026:JHHC:30109 )

2

are yet to be examined before the court, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named is rejected.

7. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX-e-mail.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.10.2026 Uploaded on 09.10.2026 Binit/