B.A./8775/2026 of MOHAN HANSDA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 7 October 2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Gurabanda P.S. Case No. 09/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned SDJM, Ghatshila.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2026 and has been falsely implicated in this case. The charge-sheet has already been submitted.

3. Learned counsel for the Informant as well as the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the victim has suffered grievous injuries on vital part of her body and in such circumstances, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. They have also submitted that the independent witnesses have also supported the allegation against the petitioner including the daughter of the victim.

4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation made against the petitioner, which led to grievous

2026:JHHC:30062

injuries on the vital part of the body of the victim, which is also supported by the independent witnesses, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is hereby rejected.

5. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’.

(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 07.10.2026

Uploaded On: 08.10.2026

Mukul/-