Jharkhand High Court

Cr.A(SJ)/420/2025 of SUBHASH CHANDRA MANDAL Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026

2026:JHHC:29794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.420 of 2025 ---- 1. Subhash Chandra Mandal, aged about 52 years, Son of Late Narayan Chandra Mondal 2. Yashoda Mondal @ Yashoda Devi, aged about 50 years, wife of Late Vikash Chandra Mondal. All resident of Village

2026:JHHC:29794

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.420 of 2025

----

1. Subhash Chandra Mandal, aged about 52 years, Son of Late Narayan Chandra Mondal

2. Yashoda Mondal @ Yashoda Devi, aged about 50 years, wife of Late Vikash Chandra Mondal. All resident of Village Ramchandrapur, P.O. Jaikistopur, P.S. Pakur (M), District Pakur

…. …. Appellant(s) -Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Sujan Turi, aged about 47 years, son of Late Sama Turi, Resident of Village Tantipada, P.O. & P.S. Pakur (Town), District Pakur (Jharkhand)

…. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----

For the Appellants

: Mr. Anjani Kumar, Adv.

For the State

: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.

Page 1 of 2

----

08/Dated: 06th October, 2026

1. Heard the parties.

2. The present criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, for grant of anticipatory bail though the same bars under Section 18 of the SC/ST (PoA) Act.

3. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge SC/ST Act, Pakur in A.B.P No.87 of 2025 whereby the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No.03 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3) & 352 of the BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(d)/3(1)(gh) & 3(1)(z) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case is presently pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I- cum-Special Judge SC/ST Act, Pakur.

4. After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal appeal with a liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law.

2026:JHHC:29794

5. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection.

6. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal is, hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 06th October, 2026 Raja/- Uploaded

Page No.2 Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.420 of 2025

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead