Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9310/2026 of VIRENDRA BHUIYAN @ VIRENDAR BHUIYA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9310 of 2026 Virendra Bhuiyan @ Virendar Bhuiya, aged about 34 years, son of Late Suresh Bhuiyan, resident of Coal Company, Bhadani Nagar, P.O. Bhadani Nagar, P.S. Patratu (Bhadani Nagar O.P.), District Ramgarh, Jharkhand. …
2026:JHHC:29892
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9310 of 2026
Virendra Bhuiyan @ Virendar Bhuiya, aged about 34 years, son of Late Suresh Bhuiyan, resident of Coal Company, Bhadani Nagar, P.O. Bhadani Nagar, P.S. Patratu (Bhadani Nagar O.P.), District Ramgarh, Jharkhand.
…
…
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…
… Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
---
For the Petitioner
: Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocate
---
05/6th October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Ramgarh (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 10/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 69, 89, 352 & 351(2) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2026 having no criminal antecedent and the charge- sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner and the victim are major. The victim is a widow, aged 26 years, and it is alleged that the petitioner established physical relationship with her on the false pretext of marriage. The petitioner and the victim have stayed together for more than two years.
3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, she does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that both the parties are major, the victim had stayed with the petitioner for quite some time and that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing
2026:JHHC:29892
bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 10/2026, subject to the following conditions: -
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The petitioner shall not disturb the victim or her family members in any manner whatsoever. In the event of any such occurrence of disturbance, it shall be open to the victim/her family members to move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner before the concerned court.
6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 06.10.2026
Uploaded On: 08.10.2026
Mukul/-