Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8792/2026 of PYARELAL TANTI ALIAS PYARELAL KUMAR @ PIYARELAL TANTI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8792 of 2026 ------ Pyarelal Tanti @ Pyarelal Kumar @ Piyarelal Tanti, Aged about 20 years, S/o- Bhola Tanti, R/o. Village- Kokrakhas, P.O. and P.S.- Balbedda, District- Godda (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29912] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8792 of 2026
------ Pyarelal Tanti @ Pyarelal Kumar @ Piyarelal Tanti, Aged about 20 years, S/o- Bhola Tanti, R/o. Village- Kokrakhas, P.O. and P.S.- Balbedda, District- Godda (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Kabisha Goenka, Advocate
Mr. Aman Shekhar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-06-10-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Belbadda P.S. Case No.16 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Pintu Tanti. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but automatic pistol and live cartridges as well as fired cartridges have been recovered from his possession. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his self-confessional statement and the confessional statement of the co-accused. It is also submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted but no witness has been examined as yet. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2026 passed in B.A. No.7990 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Belbadda P.S. Case No.16 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.10.2026-Animesh/