Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9324/2026 of RANJEET KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9324 of 2026 ------ Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary, Aged about 34 years, Son of Late Rajendra Choudhary, Residnet of Village – Gangpacho, P.O. & P.S. – Barkatha, District – Hazaribagh, (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29918] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9324 of 2026
------ Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary, Aged about 34 years, Son of Late Rajendra Choudhary, Residnet of Village – Gangpacho, P.O. & P.S. – Barkatha, District – Hazaribagh, (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjan Kumar, Advocate
Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-06-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 108 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed cheating and criminal breach of trust by taking Rs.10,000/- for document verification of the informant for recruitment as Home Guard police. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2026 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 28.09.2026 passed in B.A. No.9093 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribagh in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 108 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-06.10.2026 Saroj/