Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9317/2026 of IMROJ ANSARI ALIAS HAIDAR Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9317 of 2026 ------ Imroj Ansari @ Haidar, aged about 27 years, S/o Makbul Ansari, R/o Village – Thana Toli, P.O. P.S. & District – Lohardaga. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29925] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9317 of 2026
------ Imroj Ansari @ Haidar, aged about 27 years, S/o Makbul Ansari, R/o Village – Thana Toli, P.O. P.S. & District – Lohardaga. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Md. Altmash Khan, Advocate For the State
: Md. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-06-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 17(a), 21(a), 22(a), 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin and 2.50 grams of brown sugar which was sold by the petitioner to the co-accused, has been recovered from the co-accused Jitan Goswami @ Sethi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the seized brown sugar comes under small quantity and there is no recovery of any contraband from the possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.08.2026 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Lohardaga in connection with Lohardaga P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-06.10.2026 Saroj/