Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8480/2026 of ALAM ANSARI @ ALAM Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8480 of 2026 Alam Ansari @ Alam, aged about 33 years, son of Liyakat Ansari @ Liyakat Momin, resident of Kherwa, P.O. & P.S. – Barhait, District - Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:JHHC:29907
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8480 of 2026
Alam Ansari @ Alam, aged about 33 years, son of Liyakat Ansari @ Liyakat Momin, resident of Kherwa, P.O. & P.S. – Barhait, District - Sahibganj
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP
---
04/06.10.2026
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.135 of 2025, registered under Sections 61(2),109(1) of the BNS, Act and Section 25(1-b)a, & Section 27 of Arms Act, now pending in the court of learned Sub – Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected on 09.03.2026 in B.A. No. 1109 of 2026 and the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail on account of his custody since 11.09.2025. He has submitted that till date charge has not been framed and the next date before the learned court is on 20.11.2026 on account of ensuing Durga Puja vacation.
4. The learned has further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the injury suffered, though by gunshot, is simple in nature.
5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the petitioner based on records, is not in dispute.
6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and considering that the petitioner is in custody since 11.09.2025 and charges have not yet been framed, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on 2026:JHHC:29907
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub – Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.135 of 2025, on the following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner.
(ii) The other bailor should be his close relative.
(iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner.
(iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court.
(v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The petitioner shall not disturb the informant and their family members. In case of any complaint, it will be open to the informant of the case to seek cancellation of the bail of the petitioner.
8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:06.10.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:08.10.2026