Jharkhand High Court
B.A./8626/2026 of MUSLIM ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8626 of 2026 ------ Muslim Ansari, aged about 27 years, S/o Mumtaj Ansari @ Bhukhan Mian @ Mumtaj Miya, R/o Vill. Huttar Upar Tola, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District Palamau, Jharkhand. Pin- 822111, Aadhar No.-2002-8584-2081 .... .... …. Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29914] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.8626 of 2026
------ Muslim Ansari, aged about 27 years, S/o Mumtaj Ansari @ Bhukhan Mian @ Mumtaj Miya, R/o Vill. Huttar Upar Tola, P.O. & P.S.- Ramgarh, District Palamau, Jharkhand. Pin- 822111, Aadhar No.-2002-8584-2081 .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl.P.P
For the Informant : Mr. Sushil Kr. Sharma, Advocate
------
Order No.03 Dated-06-10-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.10 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(6), 311 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted Rs.3,00,000/- cash, laptop and other valuables of the informant on the point of fire arms. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph-09 of the instant bail application, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner yet no witness has been examined. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-10 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.10 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-06.10.2026-Animesh/