Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9315/2026 of UTTAM KUMAR SAH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9315 of 2026 ------ Uttam Kumar Sah, aged about 22 years, son of Pandav Sah, resident of Village-Deodanr, P.O.+P.S.-Deodanr, Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29810 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9315 of 2026
------ Uttam Kumar Sah, aged about 22 years, son of Pandav Sah, resident of Village-Deodanr, P.O.+P.S.-Deodanr, Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06.10.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.148 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 317(2), 317(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has dishonestly received the stolen property and assisted in purchase of stolen property. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Drawing attention of this Court to paragraph no. 15 of the bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no T.I.P. in respect of the gold ornaments seized from the petitioner, has been made. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-19 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 30.09.2026 in B.A. No.9166 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.148 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
06.10.2026 Gunjan-