Jharkhand High Court
B.A./5424/2026 of SAURAV PALIWAR Vs STATE OF JHARKHAND on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5424 of 2026 ------ Saurav Paliwar, aged about 28 years, son of Prabhakar Paliwar, Resident of Shiv Ganga Lane, P.O. & P.S. – Deoghat Town, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29927] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5424 of 2026
------ Saurav Paliwar, aged about 28 years, son of Prabhakar Paliwar, Resident of Shiv Ganga Lane, P.O. & P.S. – Deoghat Town, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate
Ms. Pragati R. Narayan, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-07 Dated:-06-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 106 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 351(4), 352, 308(5), 111(2), 111(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, demanded extortion of Rs.1,00,000/- and threatened him to kill if he lodges the case. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.05.2026 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 106 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-06.10.2026 Saroj/