Jharkhand High Court
WPC/3274/2024 of M/S BABA COMPUTERS BABA ENCLAVE RANCHI THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RITESH CHANDRA GUPTA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (C) No. 3274 of 2024 M/s. Baba Computers, Baba Enclave, Ranchi through its Proprietor Ritesh Chandra Gupta, s/o Late Pradeep Chandra Gupta, age about 47 years, r/o Flat No. Baba Enclave, Pinjara Pole, Uppar Bazar, P.O.- GPO,
(2026:JHHC:29681-DB)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P (C) No. 3274 of 2024
M/s. Baba Computers, Baba Enclave, Ranchi through its Proprietor Ritesh Chandra Gupta, s/o Late Pradeep Chandra Gupta, age about 47 years, r/o Flat No. Baba Enclave, Pinjara Pole, Uppar Bazar, P.O.- GPO, Ranchi, P.S.- Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand
... Petitioner
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Secretary, Department of women, Child Development and Social Security, Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O +P.S- Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi
3. Union of India
4. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India, New Delhi, P.O- Connaught Place, P.S.- Tilak Marg, Dist. New Delhi
5. Director, NISD, National Institute of Social Defence, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, Govt. of India, New Delhi, P.O. Dwarka Sect. 6, P.S.- Dwarika, Dist.- New Delhi
... Respondents
---------
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ PRASAD
--------- For the Petitioner: Mr Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the Resp.-State: Mr Ratnesh Kumar, SC (L&C)-I For the Resp.-UOI : Mr Ravi Prakash, C.G.C.
--------- 09/ Dated: 05.10.2026
1. Mr Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to resort to the alternative remedies as may be available under the law. He says that I.A. No.13918 of 2026 is also been filed seeking leave to withdraw this petition with liberty.
(2026:JHHC:29681-DB)
2. The request is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Accordingly, leave is granted and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to avail of the alternate remedies as may be provided under the law.
4. All contentions of all parties are however left open since we have not adjudicated upon them.
5. This petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms.
6. I.A. No.13918 of 2026 is also disposed of. No costs.
(M.S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Manoj Prasad, J.)
October 05, 2026
Pramanik/Anjali Uploaded on 07/10/2026