Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9270/2026 of MD AFTAB ANSARI @ PAKDU @ AFTAB ANSARI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9270 of 2026 ------ Md. Aftab Ansari @ Pakdu @ Aftab Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Ajim Ansari, resident of Near Imam Bara, Bagdige Basti, Kumidih, P.O.-Bhulanbararee, P.S.-Jorapokhar, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
( 2026:JHHC:29697 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9270 of 2026
------ Md. Aftab Ansari @ Pakdu @ Aftab Ansari, aged about 37 years, son of Ajim Ansari, resident of Near Imam Bara, Bagdige Basti, Kumidih, P.O.-Bhulanbararee, P.S.-Jorapokhar, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Karan Kumar, Advocate
: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 05.10.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bermo P.S. Case No.115 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 331 (1) and 305 (a) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed theft of gold and silver ornament as well as cash from the dwelling house of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet he has been remanded in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused-Rahul Kumar Verma as well as his confessional statement recorded in connection with Gomia P.S. Case No.76 of 2025. It is also submitted that though chargesheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.06.2026 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 06 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 20.07.2026 in B.A. No.6711 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Bermo P.S. Case No.115 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
05.10.2026 Gunjan-