Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9290/2026 of MUNNI DEVI Vs THE STATE OF JARKHAND on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9290 of 2026 ------ Munni Devi, aged 43, W/o – Babla Ram, R/o – Near Devi Mandap, Kokar Bazar, P.O. – Kokar, P.S. Sadar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29735] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9290 of 2026
------ Munni Devi, aged 43, W/o – Babla Ram, R/o – Near Devi Mandap, Kokar Bazar, P.O. – Kokar, P.S. Sadar, Dist.- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate Mr. Bhanu Kr. No.1, Advocate Ms. Kaushiki Mishra, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-05-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar (Mesra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 384 of 2026(N) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(b), 22(b), 23, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal possession of 89.32 grams of brown sugar which is also known as Heroin. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.08.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge, Ranchi in connection with Sadar (Mesra O.P.) P.S. Case No. 384 of 2026(N) with the condition that she will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish her mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that she will not change her mobile number during the trial of the case and she will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-05.10.2026 Saroj/