Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9240/2026 of SHIV KUMAR SHARMA @ SHIV NANDAN SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9240 of 2026 ------ Shiv Kumar Sharma @ Shiv Nandan Sharma, aged 33 years, S/o Deepnarayan Sharma, R/o Vill :- Ward No.15 Gangta Khurd, P.O. Godda, P.S. Godda (T) Dist. Godda .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29678] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9240 of 2026
------ Shiv Kumar Sharma @ Shiv Nandan Sharma, aged 33 years, S/o Deepnarayan Sharma, R/o Vill :- Ward No.15 Gangta Khurd, P.O. Godda, P.S. Godda (T) Dist. Godda .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate
Ms. Jagriti, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-05-10-2026
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a Supplementary Affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.144 of 2026 (N.D.P.S. Case No.14 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 22, 25, 27- A, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale of Brown Sugar which is also known as Heroin and from the possession of the petitioner only 2.45 gm of Brown Sugar was recovered in connection with this case and altogether 20.65 gm of Brown Sugar was recovered in connection with this case which comes under intermediate quantity. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.08.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.144 of 2026 (N.D.P.S. Case No.14 of 2026)with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-05.10.2026-Animesh/