Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9292/2026 of RAVI SINGH Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9292 of 2026 ------ Ravi Singh, aged about 46 years, Son of Late Tekari Singh, Resident of Vill – Dulsulma, P.O. – Dulsulma, P.S. – Satbarwa, District - Palamau .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29736] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9292 of 2026
------ Ravi Singh, aged about 46 years, Son of Late Tekari Singh, Resident of Vill – Dulsulma, P.O. – Dulsulma, P.S. – Satbarwa, District - Palamau .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Md. Hadish Ansari, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P.
------ Order No:-02 Dated:-05-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No. 56 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 236(b), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of Pawan Singh and caused disappearance of the evidence of his murder to screen himself and the co-accused persons of the offence. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of self-confessional statement leading to the recovery of bamboo stick used in the offence. It is also submitted that the cause of death is asphyxia due to hanging and this is a case of suicide. It is further submitted that the main allegation is against the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.05.2026 as mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Palamau in connection with Satbarwa P.S. Case No. 56 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:-05.10.2026 Saroj/