Jharkhand High Court
B.A./7796/2026 of AWADHESH LOHRA ALIAS ROHIT LOHRA Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7796 of 2026 ------ Awadhesh Lohra @ Rohit Lohra, aged about 29 years, Son of Late Bhadu Lohra, Resident of Village- Bandua, P.O. & P.S.- Herhanj, District- Latehar, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[ 2026:JHHC:29753] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7796 of 2026
------ Awadhesh Lohra @ Rohit Lohra, aged about 29 years, Son of Late Bhadu Lohra, Resident of Village- Bandua, P.O. & P.S.- Herhanj, District- Latehar, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. S.K. Dubey, Addl.P.P.
(Through V.C.)
------ Order No:-04 Dated:-05-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case no. 216 of 2026 arising out of Herhanj P.S. Case No. 47 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-B)(a), 26(2), 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and under Section 25(6) and 25(7) of the Arms Amendment Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner files supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an extremist organization known as ‘J.J.M.P.’ was to assemble for a meeting along with the co-accused persons from whose possession a loaded A.K. 47 Semi-Automatic Rifle and several rounds of live cartridges of 7.62 mm. bore were recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that no arms were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and though charge has been framed on 10.09.2026 yet to know witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.11.2025 as mentioned in para-08 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co- operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar in connection with S.T. Case no. 216 of 2026 arising out of Herhanj P.S. Case No. 47 of 2023 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 05.10.2026 Amar/