Jharkhand High Court

B.A./8000/2026 of SAMUAL ANSARI @ SAHIL ANSARI @ CHHOTU Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026

2026:JHHC:29872

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8000 of 2026 --------- Samual Ansari @ Sahil Ansari @ Chhotu, aged about 20 years, son of Samsuddin Ansari, resident of village Husir, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party ---------

2026:JHHC:29872

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 8000 of 2026

--------- Samual Ansari @ Sahil Ansari @ Chhotu, aged about 20 years, son of Samsuddin Ansari, resident of village Husir, P.O. & P.S. Kanke, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand.

....Petitioner

Versus The State of Jharkhand

....Opp. Party

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P.

Page 1 of 3

--------- 02/ 05.10.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 109 read with Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits no firearm, ammunition or incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put to TIP, as such, he has not even been identified by the informant. Learned counsel further submits that except the confessional statement before the police, there is no material in the hands of the prosecution against the petitioner in the entire investigation. Further, the charge-sheet has been submitted and as such, there is no chance of tempering with the evidence. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.09.2025, having no prior criminal antecedent; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

5. Having regard to the period of custody of the petitioner coupled with the fact that charges have been framed; I am inclined to enlarge 2026:JHHC:29872

Page 2 of 3

the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C.-XVIII, Ranchi, in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 788 of 2025, corresponding to Vidhan Sabha P.S. Case No. 55 of 2025.

6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.

(Deepak Roshan, J.) 5th October, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 08.10.2026

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead