Jharkhand High Court
A.B.A./5561/2026 of RAHUL SAW Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5561 of 2026 ------ 1. Rahul Saw, aged about 28 years, S/o Sahdev Saw, Resident of Village Karar, P.O. and P.S.-Panki, Karar District Palamau. 2. Horil Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years, S/o Thakuri Saw, Resident of Serangdag, P.O. and
( 2026:JHHC:29728 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.5561 of 2026
------
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Rahul Saw, aged about 28 years, S/o Sahdev Saw, Resident of Village Karar, P.O. and P.S.-Panki, Karar District Palamau.
2. Horil Kumar Sahu, aged about 34 years, S/o Thakuri Saw, Resident of Serangdag, P.O. and P.S.-Kasiadih, District-Chatra.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 05-10-2026
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 instituted under Sections 316(2), 316(3), 316(5), 318(4), 303(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are the owners of the vehicles which were involved in transportation of low-grade coal having less fixed carbon in their trucks. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there is no agreement between the petitioners and the company of the informant and the vehicles of the petitioners were engaged by Rajdhani Transport, with the ownership of which the petitioners are no way associated. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the co-accused persons have already given the privileges of anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 15.09.2025 in A.B.A. No.5353 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Seraikella in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 05/10/2026 Abhiraj/