Jharkhand High Court
B.A./9254/2026 of BIJAY SINGH @ BIJAY GORI Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND on 5 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9254 of 2026 ------ Bijay Singh @ Bijay Gori, Aged about 42 years, S/O- Ganesh Singh, R/O- Gori Tola, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S.- Sahibganj (Mufassil), District- Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
[2026:JHHC:29683] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.9254 of 2026
------ Bijay Singh @ Bijay Gori, Aged about 42 years, S/O- Ganesh Singh, R/O- Gori Tola, P.O.- Sahibganj, P.S.- Sahibganj (Mufassil), District- Sahibganj
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-05-10-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sahibganj (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.105 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 364, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, has abducted and committed murder of Abdul Kayum @ Munna. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that except suspicion, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.08.2023 passed in B.A.
No.3722 of 2023. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 25.05.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.105 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-05.10.2026-Animesh/